New London Architecture

Learning from Hatcham and Ilderton Road Design Code

Monday 21 March 2022

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Matias Piazza

Senior Urban Designer
Farrells

On Thursday 10th March, myself and a panel of experts, including Sarah Allan, Head of Architecture, Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, Tara Gbolade, Co-Founder & Director, Gbolade Design Studio, Colin Wilson, Head of Regeneration Old Kent Road, London Borough of Southwark and Jane Manning, Director, Allies and Morrison, took part in an online discussion to explore what the NMDC’s mean for the changing faces of our cities, the challenges with implicating them and what the results are from the first tried and tested examples. 

Based on our experience from our design-led process producing the Hatcham and Ilderton Road Design Code, myself and Tara Gbolade, discussed the key lessons and elements to take forward as part of the NMDC pilot project programme and how defining character and identity of a place and translating it into design rules capable of enabling (and not restricting!) good development proves to be quite complex.

© Farrells

The Work of Many Hands

Is a simple, elegant idea that has been at core of what we do for fifty years. Urban Design, master-planning and design codes will always require robust engagement to be meaningful and successful. The process requires an in-depth knowledge of the site - not only on its heritage, architecture and urban grain, but also, its communities and social networks. For Hatcham and Ilderton Road, this was done formally, through regular workshops with key stakeholders, developers and L.B. Southwark, to acquire their knowledge of the site after years of experience delivering the AAP and negotiation with several developments along the Old Kent Road; and informally, simply by being constantly on site, talking to people and conducting countless one-to-one interviews with the local community, to learn and deep dive into understanding the concerns and needs of local business & residents.

Though essential and enjoyable, this is often an underestimated element of the design process, demanding a lot of time and resources – especially when considering the fragmented nature of the site, dealing with multiple property lines, several stakeholders and interests instead of one single application boundary.

© Farrells
The Work of Many Hands

Perhaps Beautiful, Definitely Accessible

Whilst the physical outcomes and the influence that Design Codes will have in preserving the character and identity of areas will have to be tested through time, one significant and immediate benefit of the design process has been accessibility. By adopting language that escapes jargon and technical graphics that avoid the abstraction of masterplans and planning drawings – aided by some large-scale models – the debate with residents and businesses can focus on the look and feel of proposals, enabling an honest discussion about design elements such as massing, heights, land uses, landscape, parking, servicing, and so many others. Rather than enforcing rules, Design Codes can enable a healthy and constructive communication tool between multiple stakeholders. 

From high-level to ground-level, proposals were supported by clear ‘user perspective’ collages and diagrams – instead of the commonly confusing and technical plans – all collated in a short document of 20-pages with a clear narrative. As a result, the clear visual presentation encouraged a greater level of engagement during the public exhibition and proposals became more tangible and specific for a wide variety of people. 

© Farrells
Perhaps Beautiful, Definitely Accessible

Test, Adapt, Repeat!

Finally, fundamental to the implementation of Design Codes is finding the right balance between aspirations and viability. Again, engagement plays a key role in treading the careful line between giving prescriptive instruction and allowing room for flexibility and interpretation by design and development teams. Working in a fast-changing area, where change is well under way, we were able to benchmark proposals against on-going developments, testing proposed design guidance with active developers, a supporting technical panel and a formal Community Review Panel session. 

There needs to be room for change, for flexibility. Design Codes should be able to adapt over time, responding to ever changing nature of places, to prevent them becoming obsolete. With digital tools playing an increasingly bigger role in planning, they could be a solution to ensure that Design Codes are a live accessible resource rather than an archived document.

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Matias Piazza

Senior Urban Designer
Farrells


Planning

#NLAPlanning


Related

Can hostile vehicle mitigation improve the public realm?

News

Can hostile vehicle mitigation improve the public realm?

Reflecting on our latest talk exploring the implementation of Hostile Vehicle Mitigation (HVM) and utilising CPNI’s reco...

Planning today

Video

Planning today

Thomas Bender, specialist in heritage and architecture, listed buildings and large developments at planning consultants...

Watch video
Continued Uncertainty about Final Planning System Reforms and the Application of Design Codes in Practice

News

Continued Uncertainty about Final Planning System Reforms and the Application of Design Codes in Practice

Riette Oosthuizen of HTA Design reports from the first meeting of the New Expert Panel on Planning.

Stay in touch

Upgrade your plan

Choose the right membership for your business

Billing type:
All prices exclude VAT
View options for Personal membership