New London Architecture

Technical Competency: Retrofit

Friday 23 September 2022

Tal Ben-Amar

Founding Partner
Pilbrow & Partners

Organised by NLA and hosted by HTS, ‘Technical Competency: Retrofit’ brought together experts and practitioners from across the built environment to discuss the latest methodologies and technical innovations in retrofitting. 
 
The Kensington Building was presented by Tal Ben-Amar, Founding Partner of architects and urban designers Pilbrow & Partners.
 
The panel of experts included Federico Ortiz, Head of Research at NLA, Mark Tillett, Director at HTS, Azzahra Mahmud, Senior Structural Engineer at HTS and Jessica Foster, Associate at Civic Engineers.

The Kensington Building; the process, the challenges and the achievements
 
With the rapid advancement - and increasingly evident impact - of climate change and the acknowledged destructive contribution from the construction industry, we all need to be more ‘climate conscious’.  
 
The retrofitting and repurposing of existing buildings is one way that we can significantly reduce our industry’s carbon footprint whilst still providing attractive and efficient accommodation.  
 
The Kensington Building is an example of how an essentially redundant structure can be reimagined. Refurbished - retrofitted - the building now meets modern environmental standards and provides relevant, adaptable and contemporary workspace.
 
Located at the corner of Kensington High Street and Wrights Lane, the recently completed Kensington Building was the former site of Pontings department store. 
 
The 1970s building occupied a prominent position adjacent to Kensington High Street Underground Station and presented a robust, reinforced concrete frame (10KN), sound foundations and floor-to-floor heights of between 4.5m and 5m. 
 
Whilst the location, sturdy frame and generous internal space combined to offer great potential, the building also had many architectural - and urban - shortcomings:

  • The building’s elevations were unbefitting of their use and location. Entrances were unclear.
  • Crude, concrete façades with narrow slot windows resulted in dark interiors. 
  • There was no direct access to fresh air. 
  • A wrap of blank frontages at ground level with anonymous, dark reflective glass elevations above presented a hostile barrier.
  • Single-glazed glass and uninsulated precast façade panels generated poor thermal performance.  
  • There was inadequate and poorly formed public realm. 
  • The building was arranged as two blocks, breaking with the street wall alignment of Wrights Lane and generating sterile, unused spaces. 
  • Access to the adjacent Underground Station was limited. Approach was via the congested Kensington Arcade or an informal secondary route through a Boots retail unit; an unwelcoming entrance which closed out of retail hours. 
  • The retail offer was compromised and unvaried and the constrained frontage presented limited opportunities to introduce new entrances. 
  • Split over three floors, the shape of the building created an inefficient retail unit. 
  • The office space was supported by four cores which created an inflexible floor plate with weak access from a small and badly located lobby, close to the loading bay.
 
Considerations that informed the decision to reuse the building’s structure
 
  • A more energy-efficient building as compared to new build.
  • A shorter construction programme.
  • A lower construction cost.
  • Good record information.
  • A reinforced concrete frame in general good order.
  • Regular structural grid.
  • Sound foundations.
  • Generous floor-to-floor height.
 
The original building
 
Working with the 1970s building was both a challenge and an opportunity. 
 
The challenge was urbanistic. A brutalist structure, the original building eroded the historic definition of the surrounding streets.
 
The opportunity was the generously proportioned interior space. High floor loadings allowed the building to be extended and remodelled with sensitivity.
 
The retrofit
 
The retrofit of The Kensington Building adapts and remodels the former department store to deliver 95,000sqft of BREEAM Excellent workspace and 34,000sqft of retail space. This represents an increase of circa 50% over the original building.
 
Externally, the architecture restores the historic alignment on Wrights Lane with high quality brick and stone elevations, sensitive to the traditions of Kensington.
 
Internally, the design celebrates the retention of the original structure which is left exposed within the lower office floors. There is a considered balance between old and new, particularly at the interface between the new brick and stone façades and the underlying structure within. Here, the alignment and indeed misalignment of the historic and contemporary grids enrich the elevations.
 
The quality and quantum of office space is increased. Flexible, environmentally sustainable workspace is now served by a core set on the eastern boundary next to the underground.
 
The upper office levels step back to create a sequence of landscaped terraces, introducing biodiversity and enhancing the outlook for both office users and neighbours.
 
Public realm is improved through the creation of a new arcade connecting to Kensington High Street Underground Station. 
 
The ground floor retail offer is elevated with Boots retained as the anchor tenant. Smaller scale, independent units activate the galleria.
 
The Kensington Building enjoys exceptional public transport links and provides 165 cycle parking spaces, showering and changing facilities to encourage cycling to work.

Sustainability 
 
Not every building is suitable for retrofitting. However, in the case of The Kensington Building, reutilising the superstructure frame of the former Pontings Department Store made a substantial contribution to reducing embodied energy as well as minimising construction disturbance, traffic generation and material excavation to land fill.
 
This approach fully exploited the underutilised structural capacity of the existing frame. The department store was built with 5KN/m2 live load allowances, well in excess of that required by the proposed office use. We were able to utilise this live load allowance to support the three additional storeys of accommodation created in the refurbishment.
 
The retained superstructure forms an integral part of the building’s environmental system. Developed with WSP, the superstructure is exposed and serves to passively temper the internal atmosphere. Air is delivered from the floor which allows free-cooling to be exploited in mid-season. This displacement system is associated with higher air volumes and less air mixing.
 
Sensor controls maximise operational efficiency.
 
Horizontal surfaces are optimised to provide landscaping with sustainable urban drainage or plant; the latter is integrated with on-site renewables with an expected annual energy production of 12,000kWh.
 
Calculations of embodied energy suggest the total building embodied energy (A1 to A5) is 700kg/CO2eq/m2. An equivalent new build would have embodied energy characteristics twice as high as this figure.
 
Retrofit vs. new build
 
Sustainability, character, social and economic infrastructure and sense of heritage should be the key considerations when assessing the benefits of choosing retrofit or new build.  It is worth noting that retrofit projects would typically not be cheaper to construct and require ambitious and forward-thinking clients along with more experienced design teams and more specialised contractors.

The fact that public debate around retrofitting has started and that there are more and more projects re-utilizing existing structures are great steps towards achieving a Net Zero future. 


Tal Ben-Amar

Founding Partner
Pilbrow & Partners


Technical

#NLATechnical


Related

Technical Briefing: Understanding MVHR for Commercial Buildings

Video

Technical Briefing: Understanding MVHR for Commercial Buildings

Watch back on this Airflow webinar hosted by NLA and hear from Ian Palmer on understanding MVHR for Commercial Buildings...

Watch video
Technical Competency in the design and delivery of buildings

News

Technical Competency in the design and delivery of buildings

Liam Bryant of Webb Yates Engineers reflects on the latest Technical Expert Panel meeting and subsequent workshop in Mar...

Stay in touch

Upgrade your plan

Choose the right membership for your business

Billing type:
All prices exclude VAT
View options for Personal membership